"resources/spanish.shtml" not found

Sorry the page you are looking for is not found.


Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.

"resources/spanish.shtml" not found

Sorry the page you are looking for is not found.


Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.

YOU ARE ABOUT TO BE REDIRECTED TO THE NEW VERSION OF THIS PAGE

Recursos en Español

Varios artículos y segmentos de nuestras publicaciones fueron traducidos a español. Chasque encendido los acoplamientos siguientes para descargar cada archivo: (Adobe Acrobat PDF)

El Arte de Formular Preguntas Esenciales
(The Art of Asking Essential Questions)

La Mini-Guía para el Pensamiento Crítico Conceptos y Herramientas (Concepts and Tools)

Cómo Estudiar y Aprender una Disciplina
(How to Study and Learn a Discipline)

Pensamiento Analítico
(Analytical Thinking)

Cómo Mejorar el Aprendizaje Estudiantíl
(How To Improve Student Learning)

Ideas Prácticas para Promover el Aprendizaje Activo y Cooperativo
(Active and Cooperative Learning)

Guía de los niños al pensamiento crítico
(Children's guide to Critical Thinking)

Manual del profesor a la guía de los niños
(Teacher's Manual to the Children's Guide)

Cómo Leer un Párrafo
(How to read a paragraph)

Cómo Escribir un Párrafo
(How to Write a Paragraph)

Get Abobe Acrobat Reader OnlineAdobe Acrobat De la Transferencia directa


Lógica de la filosofía y lógica de la sociología (Presentación del Web)




Aprender a Pensar (muestra)


Para comprar el libro Aprender a pensar,
contactar Ramon.Orduna@pearsoned.com


Entre nuestro equipo de presentadores contamos con Rush Cosgrove, quien puede desarrollar los Talleres sobre el Pensamiento Crítico, en español. Rush es una persona capacitada para hablar en español, sin embargo, aún no lo domina con fluidez y puede cambiar del español al inglés al estar presentando.

El Sr. Rush Cosgrove, es un Colaborador de la Fundación y Centro para el Pensamiento Crítico. El Sr. Cosgrove posee unos antecedentes únicos: Es uno de los pocos estudiantes a quien se le ha enseñado de manera sistemática el Pensamiento Crítico desde los 10 años. Fue seleccionado precisamente a esa edad para pasar de la línea tradicional de instrucción a un programa independiente de estudio diseñado y supervisado por los Doctores Paul y Elder. Tomó aproximadamente la mitad de sus clases bajo este modelo. El resto de sus créditos de bachillerato los tomó a nivel universitario.

Es altamente eficaz cuando conduce talleres acerca del pensamiento crítico, tanto para estudiantes como para la facultad. Como estudiante de bachillerato en la universidad, tomó todos los cursos de español disponibles y ha dado numerosos talleres sobre Pensamiento Crítico en español tanto a estudiantes como a facultades de escuelas, universidades e institutos mexicanos, incluyendo La Universidad de las Américas en Puebla, el Instituto Tecnológico Agropecuario en Torreón, Coahuila; la Universidad Autónoma de Baja California en Ensenada y la Escuela Normal Superior en Ensenada, Baja California.

Anualmente, funge como presentador principal en el Congreso Internacional sobre el Pensamiento Crítico.

El Sr. Cosgrove es un elocuente portavoz del pensamiento crítico tanto en su enseñanza como en su aprendizaje.

Los Honorarios por los Servicios Profesionales prestados por el Sr. Cosgrove se dan a continuación (los precios están en dólares de EU):

CA:
$1,035 por 1 día de Servicio, $1,717 por 2 días de Servicio.

WA OR ID NV AZ UT:
$1,295 por 1 día de Servicio, $2,092 por 2 días de Servicio

MT ND SD WY NE CO NM KS OK TX:
$1,490 por 1 día de Servicio, $2,335 por 2 días de Servicio

MN IA MO AR LA MS TN KY IL WI MI IN OH AL:
$1,630 por 1 día de Servicio, $2,530 por 2 días de Servicio

Para la contratación de los servicios del Sr. Cosgrove en México o en otros países de habla hispana, consulte acerca de sus honorarios (los gastos de viaje se consideran por separado).

Si está interesado en un taller presentado por el Sr. Cosgrove en español, envíe un correo a cct@criticalthinking.org

Aprendiendo la técnica del pensamiento crítico con Rush fue una experiencia increíble! Nos mostró ejemplos prácticos aplicados tanto a la vida diaria como a nuestro trabajo como profesores; desde entonces aplico la técnica con mis estudiantes de ingeniería y obtengo mejores resultados, además que observo una mayor madurez en su forma de preguntar y resolver problemas.

Juracy Soares
Facultad de Ingeniería-Ensenada
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California




Go to top

Critical Thinking

"resources/spanish.shtml" not found

Sorry the page you are looking for is not found.


Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.

"resources/spanish.shtml" not found

Sorry the page you are looking for is not found.


Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.