How to Write a Paragraph: The Art of Substantive Writing [Electronic License]

The information on this page is about the electronic licensing process for this title. To read information about the publication itself, please visit its main product page.


Electronic Licensing for Educational Institutions

(50-license minimum.)


The terms and conditions of licensing this title can be reviewed below. A copy of terms and conditions will also be displayed during the checkout process.

How It Works


In the Qty. field below, enter the number of student readers for whom you are purchasing licenses, click 'Add,' and complete the checkout process.

After placing an order for electronic licenses, and after we have received payment or a signed copy of your institution's purchase order, a PDF of the licensed publication will be will be emailed to you within one (1) business day. The contents of this PDF can then be provided to students via student portal or other secure electronic content-delivery system. The delivery system must be secure. Neither the PDF file nor its contents may be duplicated, redistributed, or otherwise reproduced except to provide the PDF's educational content (not the file itself) to students through a secure electronic-delivery medium. The content can be provided to as many students as the number of purchased licenses.

A full copy of the terms and conditions are below.

For mass licensing (department-wide, campus-wide, institution-wide, etc.), please email
cct@criticalthinking.org.

$6.16



SKU: Title - Item Detail Price Add Items
535MEL The Thinker’s Guide to How to Write a Paragraph Qty.

Additional Information About:
How to Write a Paragraph: The Art of Substantive Writing [Electronic License]

Dear Administrators, Faculty, Students, Book Purveyors, and all others:

You are to be congratulated on working toward bringing critical thinking more deeply into the teaching and learning process. To this end, we are very pleased that you are purchasing electronic licenses for our work.

Entering into an electronic licensing agreement establishes a partnership between you and the Foundation for Critical Thinking (FCT). A primary purpose of this agreement is to protect the copyrighted materials of the Foundation for Critical Thinking and its authors, while advancing fairminded critical thinking across the world.

Possessing intellectual products such as written materials in electronic form entails certain ethical obligations.  As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, the Foundation for Critical Thinking cannot afford to freely offer all of its intellectual resources and products. Some must be purchased if we are to continue fostering critical thinking through the FCT.

The information below delineates your obligations as purchaser and maintainer of our electronic source material.

Purchaser's (i.e. your) usage of electronic licenses for any and all titles within the Thinker's Guide Library, and for any and all products developed by the Foundation for Critical Thinking, is subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. The electronic file(s) to which the purchaser will gain access is/are specifically to provide student access to the file's/files' educational content through the relevant institution's student portal(s), or other secure electronic content medium/media, for educational purposes.

1a. To this end, the Foundation for Critical Thinking will supply the relevant electronic file(s) only to the institutional employee(s) responsible for adding content to the institution's student portal(s), or other secure electronic content medium/media. Once your electronic purchase is complete, you will be contacted by the Foundation for Critical Thinking to verify your institution’s authenticity. Once this is complete, a PDF file will be send to your institution electronically for uploading to a secure student/faculty portal.

1b. The educational content of the electronic file(s) is not to be provided to students in downloadable format, or any format which would allow students to copy, share, or otherwise reproduce said content.

2. The electronic file(s) is/are not to be shared, copied, or otherwise reproduced except to establish the file on a medium, or on media, necessary to facilitate the usage outlined in item 1 above.

3. The educational content of the electronic file(s) is not to be shared, copied, or otherwise reproduced except in ways necessary to facilitate the usage outlined in item 1 above.

4. The content of the electronic file(s) is not to be provided to a greater number of students than the number of electronic licenses purchased. In order to provide the content to additional students, a new purchase must be made.

5. If you are faculty purchasing electronic licenses for your students, this agreement gives you permission to allow access for one semester to the number of students specified. If you are administration purchasing electronic licenses for institution-wide use, then this agreement authorizes you to provide access to the relevant guides for one year from the date of purchase.

6. Dispute Resolution:  In the event of any dispute as to unlicensed access to the above electronic file(s) or the number of students who have had access, the Foundation for Critical Thinking shall bring such issue to the contracting party’s attention in writing within sixty (60) days of first becoming aware of the issue.  The contracting party shall have the obligation of verifying to the Foundation’s satisfaction the exact number of students who have had licensed and unlicensed access.  That latter number shall be multiplied by the cost of a single license for access to calculate damages, to which shall be added 10% legal interest from the date the contract is signed.  If the contracting party is unable to verify the exact number who had unlicensed access, then the Parties agree to a Liquidated Damages provision of double the number of licenses purchased multiplied by the cost of a single license for access.  If the Parties are unable to come to agreement within thirty (30) days after submission of the issue in writing by the Foundation, the issue shall be submitted by either party to binding arbitration within the next thirty (30) days in Marin County, California, under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.  The prevailing party in such arbitration shall recover from the other party its costs of arbitration, including any attorney fees.

Thank you for the very important role you are playing in advancing fairminded critical societies.





Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.