The Thinker’s Guide to Intellectual Standards details and analyzes the intellectual standards by which reasoning is judged in skilled thought. The fundamental goal of this book is to illuminate the importance of explicitly mastering intellectual standards with a view to improving thinking across the multiple domains of human life.
This guide provides the foundations for thinking about the role played by standards in human thought, and the need to advance and embrace universal intellectual standards such as clarity, accuracy, relevance, significance, and sufficiency in reasoning through problems and issues. Those proficient in the use of intellectual standards think more effectively in every domain and subject in which, or about which, they think.
As part of the Thinker’s Guide Library, this book advances the mission of the Foundation for Critical Thinking to promote fairminded critical societies through cultivating essential intellectual abilities and virtues across every field of study across world.
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers / The Foundation for Critical Thinking Pages: 72 • Trim: 6 x 8 978-0-944583-39-5 • Paperback • January 2008 978-1-5381-3392-7 • eBook • June 2019 Series: Thinker's Guide Library
$28.00
Additional Information About: The Thinker's Guide to Intellectual Standards: The Words that Name Them and the Criteria that Define Them
The mind doesn’t naturally grasp the truth. We don’t naturally see things as they are. We don’t automatically sense what is reasonable and what unreasonable. Our thought is often biased by our agendas, interests, and values. We typically see things as we want to. We twist reality to fit our preconceived ideas. Distorting reality is common in human life. It is a phenomenon to which we all, unfortunately, fall prey.
We need a system for intellectual intervention, a method for pre-empting bad thinking. We need to take rational command of our cognitive processes in order to rationally determine what to accept and what to reject. In short, we need standards for thought, standards that guide us to consistently excellent thinking – standards we can count on to keep our thinking on track, to help us mirror in our minds what is happening in reality, to reveal the truth in situations, to enable us to determine how best to live our lives.
Our goal in this guide is to provide a conscious foundation for thinking about intellectual standards, and the words that name them. Ultimately, such consciousness will enable those proficient in the use of intellectual standard words to think more effectively in every domain and subject in which, or about which, they think. Of course, in this brief space, we can provide merely the beginnings of a systematic analysis of standards for thought. In doing so, we open the door to the development of a broad and integrated view of intellectual standards.
We offer a brief analysis of some of the most important intellectual standards in the English language. We look at their opposites. We argue for their contextualization within subjects and disciplines. And, we call attention to the forces that undermine their skilled use in thinking well.
When humans, as a species, begin to take seriously the important role of intellectual standards in the development of rational human cultures, when people understand the idea of intellectual standards in connection with a rich conception of critical thinking, when we commit ourselves to using intellectual standard words, explicitly and routinely in everyday life, we will begin to create critical societies. We will begin to bring into being ways of living in a world which further the values and skills of fairminded critical thinking.
Contents Include
The Concept of Intellectual Standards
Intellectual Standard Words Form a System of Interrelated Meanings
Intellectual Standards are Presupposed in Every Subject and Discipline
The Proper Use of Intellectual Standard Terms Requires Cultivation
Other Important Distinctions and Understandings
Review:
The Thinker’s Guide to Intellectual Standards: The Words That Name Them and the Criteria That Define Them (Thinker’s Guide) is an unusual work. When I first started reading this pamphlet, I wondered what relevance it might have to competitive intelligence.
When I was done, it reminded me of a small book I had to read my first year in law school, Maitland’s Forms of Action at Common Law. This was a series of lectures, first published in 1909, detailing the way that English common law developed the concept of accessing the state for justice. At first, I did not understand why such ancient history was relevant to modern law. But, by the time I graduated, I found that knowing the intellectual and historical roots of our common law made my understanding of the present more complete and deeper. The same is true of Thinker’s Guide.
At one level, it is a teachers guide to learning about and then teaching critical thinking, or as we in competitive intelligence sometimes call it, analysis. At another level, it is an indictment of sloppy thinking, supported by or concealed by sloppy language. It reminds us that, as one radio commentator has said more than once, “words mean things”.
I believe that anyone who teaches any aspect of CI should work his/her way through this book at least once. You will learn why precision is what you say, and what your students say, is critical to developing effective analytical, and how to communicate that message. It also serves as a reminder of how our own perspectives/biases/blind spots impair our own effective thinking and communication.
John J. McGonagle Managing Partner, The Helicon Group Winner of the Meritorious Award from the Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals
Show
Please do not pass this message by.
CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.
Here are some of the big reasons why:
Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.
As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.
WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.
Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.