VIEW A SAMPLE OF ITEM
including: Table of Contents, overviews and selected pages.
Competency Standards Preview

Get Adobe Reader

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE BELOW

A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking Competency Standards: Standards, Principles, Performance Indicators, and Outcomes with a Critical Thinking Master Rubric

Richard Paul and Linda Elder


Order from Rowman & Littlefield here.


Contact Info for Rowman & Littlefield:



  • Toll free: (800) 462-6420 ext. 3024

  • Fax: (800) 338-4550

  • Orders to orders@rowman.com

  • Queries to customercare@rowman.com


The Foundation for Critical Thinking has developed an authoritative system of competency standards to ensure successful and consistent integration of critical thinking skills in schools and educational programs at every level and in every discipline. The critical thinking competency standards articulated in this guide serve as a resource for teachers, curriculum designers, administrators and accrediting bodies.


As part of the Thinker’s Guide Library, this book advances the mission of the Foundation for Critical Thinking to promote fairminded critical societies through cultivating essential intellectual abilities and virtues across every field of study across world.

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers / The Foundation for Critical Thinking
Pages: 56 • Trim: 5 1/2 x 8
978-0-944583-30-2 • Paperback • January 2007
978-1-5381-3393-4 • eBook • June 2019
Series: Thinker's Guide Library

$28.00



SKU: Title - Item Detail Price Add Items
A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking Competency Standards: Standards, Principles, Performance Indicators, and Outcomes with a Critical Thinking Master Rubric

Additional Information About:
A Guide for Educators to Critical Thinking Competency Standards: Standards, Principles, Performance Indicators, and Outcomes with a Critical Thinking Master Rubric

Critical Thinking Competency Standards provides a framework for assessing students’ critical thinking abilities. It enables administrators, teachers, and faculty at all levels (from elementary through higher education) to determine the extent to which students are reasoning critically within any subject or discipline. These standards include outcome measures useful for teacher assessment, self-assessment, as well as accreditation documentation. These competencies not only provide a continuum of student expectations but can be contextualized for any academic subject or domain and for any grade level. In short, these standards include indicators for identifying the extent to which students are using critical thinking as the primary tool for learning. 

By internalizing the competencies, students will become more self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored thinkers. They will develop their ability to:

• raise vital questions and problems (formulating them clearly and precisely);

• gather and assess relevant information (using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively and fairly);

• come to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions (testing them against relevant criteria and standards);

• think open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought (recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences); and

• communicate effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems.

Students who internalize these competency standards will come to see that critical thinking entails effective communication and problem-solving skills, as well as a commitment to overcoming one’s native egocentric and sociocentric tendencies.

 

All students (beyond the elementary level) are expected to demonstrate all of the critical thinking competencies included in this battery of demonstrable skills, but not at the same level of proficiency, or in the same subjects or at the same speed. These competencies signal important habits of thought that manifest themselves in every dimension and modality of learning: for example, in student reading, writing, speaking, and listening, as well as in professional and personal activities. It is up to the teacher or institution to contextualize and sequence the competencies, for different disciplines, and at differing levels.

The simple truth is that teachers are able to foster critical thinking only to the extent that they themselves think critically. This may be the single most significant barrier to student achievement of critical thinking competencies. For teachers to aid students in becoming deep thinkers, they must themselves think deeply. For teachers to aid students in developing intellectual humility, they must themselves have developed intellectual humility. For teachers to foster a reasonable, rational multi-logical worldview, they must themselves have developed such a worldview. In short, teaching for critical thinking presupposes a clear conception of critical thinking in the mind of the teacher.

The critical thinking competency standards articulated in this guide serve as a resource for teachers, curriculum designers, administrators and accrediting bodies. The use of these competencies across the curriculum will ensure that critical thinking is fostered in the teaching of any subject to all students at every grade level.

Contents include:


SECTIONS ONE AND TWO: Focusing on elements of reasoning, and intellectual standards:

  • Standard One: Purposes, Goals, and Objectives
  • Standard Two: Questions, Problems, and Issues
  • Standard Three: Information, Data, Evidence, and Experience
  • Standard Four: Inferences and Interpretations
  • Standard Six: Concepts, Theories, Principles, Definitions, Laws, & Axioms
  • Standard Nine: Assessing Thinking

SECTION THREE: Focusing on intellectual traits, virtues or dispositions:

  • Standard Ten: Fairmindedness
  • Standard Eleven: Intellectual Humility
  • Standard Twelve: Intellectual Courage
  • Standard Thirteen: Intellectual Empathy
  • Standard Fourteen: Intellectual Integrity

SECTION FOUR: Barriers to the development of rational thought:

  • Standard Eighteen: Insight into egocentric thought
  • Standard Nineteen: Insight into sociocentric thought 

SECTION FIVE: Critical thinking skills essential to learning:

  • Standard Twenty-Two: Skills in the Art of Close Reading
  • Standard Twenty-Three: Skills in the Art of Substantive Writing 

SECTION SIX: Focusing on specific domains: examples:

  • Standard Twenty-Four: Ethical Reasoning Abilities
  • Standard Twenty-Five: Skills in Detecting Media Bias and Propaganda in National and World News




Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.