VIEW A SAMPLE OF ITEM
including: Table of Contents, overviews and selected pages.
Scientific Thinking Preview

Get Adobe Reader

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE BELOW

The Thinker's Guide to Scientific Thinking - Based on Critical Thinking Concepts and Principles

Fourth Edition

Richard Paul and Linda Elder


Order from Rowman & Littlefield here.


Contact Info for Rowman & Littlefield:



  • Toll free: (800) 462-6420 ext. 3024

  • Fax: (800) 338-4550

  • Orders to orders@rowman.com

  • Queries to customercare@rowman.com


This guide focuses on developing the intellectual skills inherent in the well-cultivated scientific thinker. It helps students and practicing scientists come to reason within the logic of science and to see the field as a cohesive whole.

From astronomers to zoologists and physicists to chemists, skilled scientists use careful analysis to question data, test theories, draw logical conclusions, and propose feasible solutions. Students in science courses, and scientists themselves will find their analytical abilities enhanced by the engaging framework of inquiry set forth by Richard Paul and Linda Elder in this guide.

As part of the Thinker’s Guide Library, this book advances the mission of the Foundation for Critical Thinking to promote fairminded critical societies through cultivating essential intellectual abilities and virtues across every field of study across world.



Rowman & Littlefield Publishers / The Foundation for Critical Thinking

Pages: 66 • Trim: 5 1/2 x 8

978-0-9857544-2-6 • Paperback • January 2015

978-1-5381-3384-2 • eBook • June 2019


$28.00



SKU: Title - Item Detail Price Add Items
The Thinker's Guide to Scientific Thinking - Based on Critical Thinking Concepts and Principles

Additional Information About:
The Thinker's Guide to Scientific Thinking - Based on Critical Thinking Concepts and Principles

A critical approach to learning science is concerned less with accumulating undigested facts and scientific definitions and procedures, than with learning to think scientifically. As we learn to think scientifically, we inevitably organize and internalize facts, learn terminology, and use scientific procedures. But we learn them deeply, because they are tied into ideas we have thought through, and hence do not have to “re-learn” later. A critical approach to learning science requires us to ponder questions, propose solutions, and think through possible experiments. 

 

A well cultivated scientific thinker:

• raises vital scientific questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely;

• gathers and assesses relevant scientific data and information, using abstract ideas to interpret them effectively;

• comes to well-reasoned scientific conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards;

• thinks openmindedly within convergent systems of scientific thought, recognizing and assessing scientific assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and

• communicates effectively with others in proposing solutions to complex scientific problems.

 

Scientific thinking is, in short, self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective. It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem solving abilities as well as a commitment to developing scientific skills, abilities, and dispositions.

 

This guide is designed for students and faculty. It consists of the essence of scientific thinking concepts and tools. For faculty it provides a shared concept of scientific thinking. For students it is a scientific thinking supplement to any textbook for any science course. Faculty can use it to design science instruction, assignments, and tests. Students can use it to improve their perspective in any domain of science.

 

Contents include:

  • Why Scientific Thinking
  • The Elements of Scientific Thought
  • A Checklist for Scientific Reasoning
  • Questions Using the Elements of Scientific Thought
  • Scientific Thinking Seeks to Quantify, Explain, and Predict Relationships in Nature
  • Scientific Thinking Requires Precision
  • Experimental Thinking Requires Experimental Controls
  • Universal Intellectual Standards in Scientific Thinking
  • Analyzing the Logic of Scientific Articles
  • Analyzing the Logic of Science Textbooks
  • Two Kinds of Scientific Questions
  • Analyzing the Logic of An Experiment
  • Criteria for Evaluating Scientific Reasoning
  • Scientific Reasoning Abilities
  • Intellectual Dispositions Essential to Scientific Thinking
  • What Scientific Thinkers Routinely Do
  • Stages of Scientific Thinking Development
  • The Questioning Mind in Science (Newton, Darwin, and Einstein)
  • The Logic of Science
  • Logic of Scientific Disciplines
    • The Logic of Physics
    • The Logic of Chemistry
    • The Logic of Geology
    • The Logic of Astronomy
    • The Logic of Biology
    • The Logic of Zoology
    • The Logic of Botany
    • The Logic of Biochemistry
    • The Logic of Paleontology
    • The Logic of Animal Physiology
    • The Logic of Archaeology
    • The Logic of Ecology
  • The Problem of Unscientific Thinking
  • A Pseudo-Science: Why Astrology is Not a Science




Please do not pass this message by.

CRITICAL THINKING IS AT RISK.

Here are some of the big reasons why:

  1. Many people believe that critical thinking should be free and that scholars qualified to teach critical thinking should do so for free. Accordingly, they do not think they should have to pay for critical thinking textbooks, courses, or other resources when there is "so much free material online" - despite how erroneous that material may be.
  2. There are many misguided academicians, and some outright charlatans, pushing forth and capitalizing on a pseudo-, partial, or otherwise impoverished concept of critical thinking.
  3. Little to no funding is designated for critical thinking professional development in schools, colleges, or universities, despite the lip service widely given to critical thinking (as is frequently found in mission statements).
  4. Most people, including faculty, think they already know what critical thinking is, despite how few have studied it to any significant degree, and despite how few can articulate a coherent, accurate, and sufficiently deep explanation of it.
  5. People rarely exhibit the necessary level of discipline to study and use critical thinking for reaching higher levels of self-actualization. In part, this is due to wasting intellectual and emotional energy on fruitless electronic entertainment designed to be addictive and profitable rather than educational and uplifting.
  6. On the whole, fairminded critical thinking is neither understood, fostered, nor valued in educational institutions or societies.
  7. People are increasingly able to cluster themselves with others of like mind through alluring internet platforms that enable them to validate one another's thinking - even when their reasoning is nonsensical, lopsided, prejudiced, or even dangerous.
  8. Critical thinking does not yet hold an independent place in academia. Instead, "critical thinking" is continually being "defined" and redefined according to any academic area or instructor that, claiming (frequently unsupported) expertise, steps forward to teach it.

As you see, increasingly powerful trends against the teaching, learning, and practice of critical thinking entail extraordinary challenges to our mission. To continue our work, we must now rely upon your financial support. If critical thinking matters to you, please click here to contribute what you can today.

WE NEED YOUR HELP TO CONTINUE OUR WORK.

Thank you for your support of ethical critical thinking.